Hybrid mode for privacy: put your own server in the middle
The browser never talks to Vevee. It talks to a forty-line route on the app's own server, which decides what leaves and what does not.
Last updated: 2026-10-27
Two meanings of hybrid
In the Vevee SDK, hybrid is the default analytics mode: it writes anonymous events for visitors who have not signed up and identified events for people who have, and keeps the two apart. The visit and source tables on the Traffic page are built from the anonymous side, so they only fill in hybrid mode. The second meaning is the one this post is about: how the events get there. A study app runs every event through a proxy route on its own server instead of letting the browser call Vevee. The browser posts to the app, the app posts to Vevee. It sounds like extra plumbing, and it is the part of the setup that does the most for privacy.
The path of one pageview
Here is what happens when a student opens the pricing page from an ad, in order.
browser
attribution.pageview('/pricing')
POST /api/analytics/capture (same origin, no key, no cookie)
{ event: '$pageview', properties: { path, visit_id, utm_*, landing_path } }
app server
signed in? -> drop pageviews, strip visit fields
re-validate fields -> UUID, lengths, host shape, path without query
add context -> country, region, city from host headers; user agent
vevee.analytics.capture(...) with the secret key
Vevee
hash visit_id with a daily salt, drop the raw id, the raw user agent
and any click ids; store the anonymous eventThe secret key never reaches the browser
With a public pk_ key in the page, anyone can read the key from the bundle and send whatever events they like as your app. Vevee limits what a public key can do, but the events themselves are whatever the browser says they are. With the proxy, the only key is a secret one in a server environment variable. The browser can still post junk to the app's route, but the route decides what gets forwarded, and it can refuse. That also gives the app a single place to enforce its own rules. Signed-in users send no pageviews at all, because pageviews exist to measure acquisition and a logged-in student clicking around the editor adds noise. Identified events go out with no visit fields. Users the app knows to be under 16 are opted out automatically: their events are recorded under a random code, and no revenue events are sent for them.
// app/api/analytics/capture/route.ts
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server';
import { createClient, contextFromHeaders } from '@vevee/sdk';
const vevee = createClient({ apiKey: process.env.VEVEE_SECRET_KEY! });
export async function POST(req: Request) {
const body = (await req.json()) as { event: string; properties?: Record<string, unknown> };
const user = await getCurrentUser().catch(() => null);
// Pageviews measure acquisition; a signed-in user's clicks add only noise.
if (body.event === '$pageview' && user) return NextResponse.json({ ok: true });
const props = cleanProps(body.properties); // the app's own allowlist
await vevee.analytics.capture(
user
? { event: body.event, distinctId: user.id, properties: props }
: {
event: body.event,
properties: { ...props, ...sanitizeVisit(body.properties) },
context: contextFromHeaders(req.headers),
},
);
return NextResponse.json({ ok: true });
}Location without the IP address
A server-side call has a problem: Vevee sees the request coming from the app's server, so it cannot tell where the visitor is. The usual fix is to forward the visitor's IP and let the analytics tool look it up. The app does not forward the IP at all. Its host already did the lookup. On Vercel, every request arrives with x-vercel-ip-country, x-vercel-ip-country-region and x-vercel-ip-city headers; behind Cloudflare there is cf-ipcountry. The SDK's contextFromHeaders reads those, decodes the city, drops the unknown-country values XX and T1, adds the user agent, and returns a small object the app passes as context. The IP address never leaves the app's server, and Vevee never stores one. A secret key call that sends no geo stores no geo, since anything Vevee could infer would describe the server. On anonymous events, Vevee keeps the country, region and city. On a first touch, it keeps only the country and the device class, browser and OS.
Trust nothing from the page
The visit fields come from the browser, which means anyone can send anything. The proxy re-checks every field before forwarding it, even though the SDK's browser helper already produces clean values:
- visit_id must be a UUID. Anything else is dropped, and the event is sent without one.
- Each utm_* value is trimmed and capped at 200 characters.
- referrer_host must look like a host name: no scheme, no path, no spaces.
- landing_path must be a same-origin path starting with a slash, and its query string is removed so no email address or token in a URL can ride along.
- Unknown properties are dropped by the app's own allowlist rather than forwarded.
What it costs
One route, one environment variable, and one extra hop per event, which a keepalive fetch from the browser hides. Preview deployments need the secret key too, or they fail quietly; the app learned that one the hard way. In exchange, the app can describe exactly what leaves its server, because there is exactly one place where it does. This is the app's own setup and its own reading of what it needs; it is not legal advice. The step by step version, including the auth route that stores the first touch, is in the traffic attribution guide at /docs/guides/traffic-attribution.
More from the blog
The race condition in "if (usage < limit)" that is costing your AI app money
A user at nine of ten images opens six tabs and clicks generate in all of them. Every tab passes your limit check, every tab gets an image, and you pay for all six. The bug is one read-then-write - and your unit tests will never catch it.
engineering · 9 minHow to build a credits system for your AI app (ledger design, rollover, refunds)
A user emails: "I had 40 credits this morning and now I have 12, and I only made one image." If your balance is a column you mutated, you cannot answer that email. Here is the ledger design that can.
thinking · 7 minStripe metered billing for AI apps: what it solves and what it does not
You are sketching the pricing page for your AI app and every plan ends in "per generation" - because your costs arrive per generation. Stripe meters the charging half beautifully. The question is what happens at request time.
thinking · 8 minHelicone is in maintenance mode. An honest map of where to go
Somewhere in your codebase a base URL points at Helicone, and it has been quietly doing four jobs at once. The team got acquired - good for them - but now you have to replace each job separately, and the one everyone forgets is the one your users will exploit.
engineering · 8 minHow to stop free-tier abuse without killing signups
The usage graph spikes at 3:41am: four thousand free generations in an hour, all from disposable emails. Your first instinct is a credit-card wall. That instinct will cost you more than the abuse does.
thinking · 7 minTokens, credits, or requests: choosing the unit you meter (and price)
The pricing doc has three columns: $9, $19, $49. The prices took twenty minutes. The row above them - what a user actually gets for the money - has been blank for a week. That blank row is the real decision.
engineering · 3 minI rewrote my cancel flow with one LLM call. It argues better than I do.
The cancel flow is where SaaS revenue goes to die politely. "Are you sure? You'll lose access to Premium features" has never changed a single mind - but reminding a user of their own 312 generations this month is an argument.
engineering · 3 minThe trial-ending email everyone sends is the same email. Here's the one that converts
"Your trial ends in 3 days! Upgrade now to keep access." You've received a hundred of these. You've deleted a hundred of these. The email fails because it's about your product, not about the user's trial.
engineering · 3 minStop making users do math on your pricing page: recommend their plan from their own usage
Every pricing page asks the user to solve an estimation problem: "How many credits will I need per month?" Nobody knows. But for any user who has actually used your product, their usage history IS the answer - here is how to put it on the pricing page.
engineering · 3 minWin-back emails fail because they're written for "users." Write them for the one user instead.
Every dormant-user campaign in history: "We miss you! Here's what's new." Open rate: pity clicks. The email fails because it's about your changelog - and the user left because of something in their experience.
engineering · 3 minSpotify Wrapped is a growth loop, not a year-end gimmick. Ship one for your AI app in an afternoon.
Spotify Wrapped works because people love seeing their own behavior reflected back as a story. Every AI app with usage data can run that loop monthly - and almost none do, because turning usage rows into narrative used to be a content problem. It is now a schema problem.
engineering · 3 min"AI-personalized copy converts better" - prove it or delete it. Here is the 40-line A/B harness
Half of the "we added AI personalization and conversions went up 40%" posts have no control group. The other half measured clicks, not revenue. If LLM-generated copy is going in front of your paywall, you owe yourself a real experiment - and the harness is tiny.
thinking · 3 minAI personalization without the creepy part: opt-out as a first-class return value
Users have learned that "personalized for you" means "we mined everything you ever did" - and the backlash is rational. When I added LLM-generated personalized copy to my app, the part I sweated was not the generation. It was making declining it a real, respected choice.
engineering · 3 minI stopped walking into demo calls blind: every lead now comes with a usage brief written 10 seconds before the call
Founder-led sales has one structural weakness: you have no time to prep. If the lead has touched your product, their usage history is the best discovery call you'll never have to run - here's how I turn it into a one-page brief, automatically, before every call.
thinking · 4 minThe "founder email" converts like crazy and scales like garbage. Here is the middle path.
A personal email from the founder converts trials at a rate no automated sequence touches - and at 50 signups a week it stops scaling. The middle path: drafts generated from each user's real usage, that you read, edit, and send yourself.
engineering · 3 minChurn doesn't announce itself. My Monday Slack digest does it instead.
Every founder finds out about churn the same way: the cancellation email. By then the user has been gone for weeks - the decision happened earlier, quietly, in their usage. So I made the metering tables write me a memo.
engineering · 3 minHalf of every support ticket is asking what the user already did. Attach the answer instead.
The ticket says "it's not working" - and the next twenty minutes go to figuring out who this user is, what plan they're on, and whether "it" is a bug, a quota, or a misunderstanding. The actual fix usually takes two. All of that context lives in your usage data; here is how to attach it to every ticket automatically.
thinking · 4 minYour users are telling you your roadmap, in writing, every day. It's in your prompt logs
Founders pay for interviews and beg for survey responses to learn what people are actually trying to do. Meanwhile, your users type their intent into your product, in their own words, hundreds of times a day - and nobody performs for a prompt box.
thinking · 5 minWe ran a tagged ad and could not find one buyer
Every link in the ad had UTM tags. The checkout, the analytics tool and the host each saw part of the story, and none of them could say whether a single person who clicked ever paid.
engineering · 5 minAttribution without a cookie banner
The visit lives in a JavaScript variable. It is born when the page loads and gone when the tab closes, and in between it is enough to tell where every signup came from.
thinking · 5 minVisits and people are different funnels
Everyone wants one funnel from ad click to payment. Building it means linking an anonymous visit to a named person, and that link is exactly what lets a site skip the consent banner.
thinking · 4 minAI search is a channel now
Paid ads brought the most visits. A channel nobody paid for converted visits to signups at almost three times the rate. Until it had its own row, it was invisible.
engineering · 5 minSeven bugs we hit adding attribution
Zero visits on a day with traffic. Zero revenue after two orders. A funnel step that never fired because of one trailing dot. None of these were hard once found, and every one of them looked like something else first.
engineering · 5 minFirst touch, stored once
A first touch is written exactly once, at the moment an account is created, and never again. Getting that "exactly once" right is most of the work.
engineering · 6 minReading a split funnel
The funnel chart tells you how many got through. The split table under it tells you who. Here is a row by row reading of one, from a study app's mock month.
engineering · 5 minHow to reset usage limits when a subscription renews
A weekly plan, used twice. First week: ten generations. Second week: zero, because the counter never reset. This is the cron-job mistake - and the fix is one field on one call.
engineering · 6 minHow to manage subscription renewals: aligning Vevee with Stripe
A user signs up on Jan 15. Stripe charges them on the 15th of every month. Your metering layer resets on the 1st. Two clocks. One angry support ticket per cycle.
engineering · 5 minStop hardcoding your pricing page - render it from your metering layer
Every B2B SaaS I have shipped repeats the same mistake: plans live in two places - the dashboard that enforces them, and a const PLANS = [...] on the marketing site. They drift within a quarter.
thinking · 4 minMeter AI by user, not by account - your margin depends on it
A few users will cost you 100x what your median user costs. If you only meter at the account level, you will not see them coming until your gross margin is gone.
engineering · 5 minreserve / commit / release: the only correct way to enforce AI quotas
Every team I have seen build per-user AI metering has shipped a version of canUse → call OpenAI → track. It looks correct in single-threaded tests. It is broken in production.
thinking · 4 minWhy Stripe Billing is not enough for AI products
Stripe is excellent at one thing: turning usage into invoices. AI products need three other things, and Stripe does not do any of them.
engineering · 6 minDynamic onboarding: a different first step for every user
A teacher and a student sign up the same minute. The teacher wants to build a quiz; the student wants to summarize a lecture. Your onboarding shows them both the same five-step checklist. One of them bounces.
thinking · 6 minPaywall copy that rewrites itself for every user
Your paywall says "Upgrade to Pro for unlimited generations." A teacher reads it and shrugs. A student on a budget reads it and closes the tab. The same words, two lost conversions - because the words were written for nobody in particular.
engineering · 5 minAdd usage limits to your AI app in 10 minutes (no backend required)
You shipped an AI feature on Friday. By Monday one user had burned $212 of OpenAI credit on your free tier. The fix is not a TODO comment that says "add rate limiting" - it is two method calls.
engineering · 5 minMeter LLM tokens, not requests - your flat per-request limit is lying
Two users, both at 100 requests. One sent tweets, the other sent novels. Your cost for them differed by 400x. Your limit treated them identically - and your margins noticed.
engineering · 7 minThe upgrade nudge that writes itself: convert free users before they hit the wall
By the time a user hits your paywall, they are blocked, annoyed, and halfway to a competitor’s signup page. The best moment to make the pitch was three days earlier - when they were winning. Here is how to catch it, automatically, for every user at once.
engineering · 5 minOne event, two limits: gate your premium model without forking your code
The premium model launch was going great until you looked at the bill: free users had figured out the good model and were living on it. You need a sub-limit. You do not need a second code path.
engineering · 5 minTest mode: break your pricing in the sandbox, not on your customers
You changed the free tier from 10 to 25 generations and somehow locked out every Pro user for an hour. Nobody tested it, because testing it meant tracking fake events into production analytics. There is a mode for this.
engineering · 5 minThe support ticket that solves itself: log the prompt behind every AI event
A user says your AI feature "broke" on Tuesday. You have a charge for the call, a timestamp, and no idea what they asked or what the model said. The evidence existed for exactly one request - the one you didn’t log.
engineering · 5 minYour funnel has one broken step. Find it without writing a single SQL query.
A hundred people saw your paywall this week. Three upgraded. Is that a copy problem, a price problem, or did ninety of them never generate anything worth paying for? You cannot fix what you cannot locate.
engineering · 5 minOne user, three ghosts: fix your funnel with identify()
Your funnel says signup conversion is 4%. It is actually 11%. The missing users didn’t bounce - they came back on another tab and got counted as someone new. Every number downstream of that split is wrong.
thinking · 5 minThe usage bar that sells the upgrade (build it with a public key in an afternoon)
An invisible limit feels like a trap. A visible one feels like a fuel gauge. Same quota, same plan, same user - and a measurably different reaction when the wall finally arrives.
engineering · 6 minHow to cancel a subscription without burning the bridge (or your data)
The user cancels. Do they drop to a free tier, or lose access when the paid month runs out? Those are different products, different SDK calls, and different mistakes when you get them wrong.